Design intent protected
Sequencing, tolerance checks, inspection points.
Architect-compatible delivery • Controlled communication
For Architects
We protect design intent, solve buildability early, and report clearly — so you can focus on design and client outcomes.
Best fit for architect-led terraces and large flats across Chelsea, Belgravia, Fulham and surrounding postcodes.
One major project at a time (2026)
Controlled delivery. No volume pipeline.
Weekly written + photo reporting
Clear decisions, risks and progress.
Variations agreed before works proceed
Documented change control.
20+ years senior high-end residential site leadership
High-detail residential experience.
Buildability flagged early
Risks surfaced before tender drift.
Weekly reporting you can forward
Progress, decisions, risks, photos.
Variations agreed before works proceed
Documented change control.
What you can expect
We’re set up for high-detail residential projects where programme and client experience matter as much as finishes.
- Design intent protection through sequencing, tolerance control and inspection points
- Buildability input early — before details become problems
- Clear programme logic and trade coordination
- Variation management: documented, priced, approved before work proceeds
- Calm client communication you can forward without rewriting
- Senior site leadership (no rotating supervision)
How we protect design intent (in practice)
“Design intent protected” only matters if it’s operational. Our approach is simple: identify the pressure points early, sequence around critical junctions, and control decisions and change before they become disputes.
1) Buildability intelligence early
We review drawings/spec and identify:
- Set-out constraints and tolerance stacking
- Junction risks between trades (structure/services/joinery/finishes)
- Sequencing constraints (drying times, access, temporary works)
- Lead time exposure and procurement risk
- Logistics constraints (neighbours, deliveries, building management)
Output: A short buildability + risk note with proposed solutions (clear, actionable, no fluff).
2) Sequencing around critical junctions
We protect the high-risk details with:
- Defined inspection points before closing-up
- Benchmarks and sample sign-offs for repeatable quality
- Controlled roll-out (prove it once, then scale)
3) Change control that protects relationships
Rule: No variation proceeds without written scope, cost and programme agreement. This keeps client expectations aligned and protects you from “it was assumed” arguments later.
Weekly reporting
Our weekly update format reduces noise and increases clarity — one place for progress, decisions, programme, risks and photos.
Weekly Report Pack (example)
- Programme status (traffic light)
- 2-week lookahead (next actions + sequencing)
- Progress summary (what changed this week)
- Decisions needed (owner/architect inputs required)
- Risks (new / active / mitigated)
- Variations log summary (submitted/approved/pending + impact)
- Photos tagged by area (fast review)
Optional (as needed)
- RFI log extract
- Lead time tracker snapshot
- Change control summary
Result line (micro): Fewer messages, fewer surprises, cleaner client communication.
Tender approach
We aim for clear scope, assumptions and programme — so the project starts in control, not in conflict. We’d rather be explicit early than argue later.
We price best when the following are clear (even at a high level):
- Latest drawings with revision status
- Specification intent (even if evolving)
- Known constraints (access, neighbours, building management, working hours)
- Decision makers (who signs off what, and how quickly)
Scope clarity
Transparent breakdown with exclusions and assumptions stated clearly, including what’s included per package.
Programme logic
Programme aligned to lead times, approvals, drying times and access — not a generic template.
Logistics built-in
Access, protection, neighbours, deliveries, waste routes and working-hour constraints planned early — not bolted on later.
Reporting + variation control
Weekly reporting commitment and documented change control: variations agreed before works proceed.
Commercial hygiene (quiet but important)
A clear route for RFIs, decisions, samples and sign-offs so information gaps don’t become site guesses.
Early Contractor Input (ECI)
If design is progressing and you want clarity before tender stress, ECI gives early visibility on buildability, lead times, and sequencing risk.
Ideal for architect-led projects where the client wants confidence before commitment.
- Buildability review + risk register
- Budget ranges by element (practical, not decorative)
- Lead time schedule and procurement strategy
- Programme logic and decision deadlines
Coordination and QA
Quality is a system, not a personality trait. Our controls typically include:
Integration line: If you already run these systems, we integrate. If you don’t, we provide structure without adding admin burden.
- Drawing register and revision control
- RFI process when design information is incomplete or conflicting
- Benchmarks / first-fix sign-offs before rolling across the project
- Inspection points for key junctions and high-risk elements
- Protection strategy for finished surfaces (to reduce rework and noise)
Best fit
Best fit when clients value detail, control and communication.
- Terraces and large flats in Central London
- High-detail scope with critical junctions and tolerance requirements
- Clients who want calm delivery and structured reporting
- Projects where programme realism matters as much as finish quality
What we need
We don’t ask for perfection. We ask for clarity.
Micro: If items are unresolved, we log them and plan decision deadlines. That’s the point.
- Latest drawings with clear revision status
- Specification intent (even if evolving)
- Confirmation of who signs off decisions (client, architect, PM)
- Known constraints (working hours, access, neighbours, building management)
FAQ
Do you work on design-and-build?
We can, but we prefer architect-led or hybrid models where design intent remains protected. If D&B is required, we agree boundaries and responsibilities upfront.
How do you handle incomplete information?
We raise an RFI. We don’t guess. If we need to proceed to protect programme, we agree a written assumption first.
Can you match premium finishes and tight set-out?
Yes — with aligned benchmarks. We propose first-fix sign-offs and controlled roll-out rather than “finish everything then argue”.
How do you keep clients calm?
One update. Same day each week. Clear decisions. No surprises. Variations agreed before works proceed.
Do you take multiple jobs at once?
We run a controlled pipeline. In 2026: one major project at a time.
What’s the best first step?
A short call or meeting with drawings (even early stage). We’ll tell you quickly if we’re a fit and where the project risk sits.
Working on a project in Central London?
Send a brief outline and we’ll advise on buildability, lead times and the best next step — without noise.